Status: Piloted

Scheduled Weld Drawings

Replacing a print-and-deliver paper process with a barcode scan that pulls up the right welding drawing on the floor.

Project notes · Building products manufacturer

Problem
Support staff searched network folders, printed drawings, and walked them to welders. Paper copies got lost or damaged, and welders waited.
My Role
UX research, UX/UI design, business analysis, project management, and robotic process automation (RPA) development · 3 months
Tools
Automation Anywhere (RPA) · Microsoft Forms · Power Automate · Network file storage
Outcome
Piloted on the manufacturing floor. Drawing retrieval dropped from 5–10 minutes to about 30 seconds, with positive feedback and interest in applying it to other paper-based processes.

The Challenge

Welders relied on paper drawings. When they needed one, support staff searched network folders by hand, printed it, and carried it to the floor. Paper copies were easily misplaced or damaged, and every delay meant welders standing by instead of working.

How might we get welders the right drawing, right away, without adding a new process for them to learn?

A welder, seen from behind, holds up a tablet that has scanned the barcode tag on a steel beam and shows the part's drawing. The beam is clamped to a welding table, with the welding gun beside it.
A welder, seen from behind, holds up a tablet that has scanned the barcode tag on a steel beam and shows the part's drawing. The beam is clamped to a welding table, with the welding gun beside it.

Who it's for

I interviewed and observed five welders on the manufacturing floor to understand how drawings moved from the network drive to the work. Three problems kept coming up:

  • Slow drawing retrieval. Finding the right drawing in network folders took too much time.
  • Unreliable paper records. Paper drawings were easily misplaced, damaged, or lost.
  • Time-heavy delivery. Support staff spent significant time finding, printing, and delivering drawings.

The barcode on every part was already part of the welders' work. That became the key: retrieval could start from something they already handled every day.

  • Welder

    Depends on having the correct drawing at the bay. Any delay or error stalls the whole job.

    Needs to

    • Get the right drawing without waiting on anyone
    • Trust that the drawing in hand is correct
    • Get back to welding fast

    Pain points today

    • Waits on support staff to find and deliver drawings
    • Works from paper copies that get damaged or lost
    • Stands by while drawings are printed and delivered

    What the design gives them

    • Scan the barcode to pull up the drawing
    • Manual entry and help when a scan fails
  • Production support

    Fields drawing requests from the floor, and spends the day finding, printing, and delivering paper.

    Needs to

    • Answer drawing requests without leaving the desk
    • Stop hunting through network folders
    • Only step in when something goes wrong

    Pain points today

    • Searches network folders by hand for each request
    • Prints and walks every drawing to the bay
    • Reprints drawings that were lost or damaged

    What the design gives them

    • Welders find drawings themselves
    • Help requests come in only when a lookup fails

The welder persona is based on interviews and observation with five welders. The production support persona represents the support staff who handled drawing requests.

User journey

  1. Stage 1: Locate the drawing

    Finding the right file for the part.

    Actions
    • Production support searches network folders by hand.
    • The welder requests the drawing and waits.
    Touchpoints

    Network folders, phone or in person

    Feelings

    Production support: frustrated · Welder: waiting

    Roadblocks
    • Finding the correct drawing takes too long
    • The welder can't look it up alone
    Opportunities

    Scan the part's barcode to pull up the drawing right away.

  2. Stage 2: Handle the paper

    Printing the drawing and keeping the copy usable.

    Actions
    • Production support prints the drawing from the file.
    • The welder works from a copy that can get damaged.
    Touchpoints

    Printer, paper drawing

    Feelings

    Production support: cautious · Welder: unsure it's current

    Roadblocks
    • Paper drawings get misplaced or damaged
    • No quick way to confirm it's the right one
    Opportunities

    Confirm the right drawing the moment it opens, with no paper.

  3. Stage 3: Deliver to the floor

    Getting the drawing to the welder's bay.

    Actions
    • Production support carries the drawing out to the bay.
    • The welder stands by until it arrives.
    Touchpoints

    Walk to the floor, in-person handoff

    Feelings

    Production support: rushed · Welder: losing time

    Roadblocks
    • Time lost locating and delivering
    • Production pauses while welders wait
    Opportunities

    The drawing on the spot, in about 30 seconds.

Initial concepts

Instead of asking welders to learn a new retrieval process, I built the concept around information already on the physical barcode. A welder scans it to pull up the matching drawing, with manual entry as a fallback.

I explored three directions:

  • A form-based bot
  • A mobile scanner
  • A bay station: a shared screen at each bay showing today's parts, with a recovery path when a scan doesn't match.

The bot and the scanner both included manual entry, help requests, and error handling for failed scans. The bay station had its own recovery path for a scan with no match.

Sketches of three concepts: a form-based bot, a mobile scanner, and a shared bay-station screen. Sketches of three concepts: a form-based bot, a mobile scanner, and a shared bay-station screen.
Redrawn from the real project; data and names changed.

Final design: designing within constraints

The final design had to work within the RPA tool's limits, not just the ideal experience. Several concepts assumed flexibility the platform couldn't support, so I narrowed to the one design that was both usable for welders and reliable to automate.

Key decisions

  • Barcode scan as the main entry point, because welders already handle the barcode.
  • Manual entry as a fallback for scratched or smudged barcodes.
  • A help button, so a failed lookup never leaves a welder stuck.
  • No separate preview screen. Pulling up the drawing already gave welders a natural point to confirm they had the right one, so a preview would have added friction without adding value.
Scan flow: a welder scans a part's barcode and the matching drawing opens. Scan flow: a welder scans a part's barcode and the matching drawing opens.
Fallback screen: manual entry fields and a help button for when a scan fails. Fallback screen: manual entry fields and a help button for when a scan fails.

Design Outcomes

The pilot replaced several manual steps (searching, printing, and delivering) with a direct scan between the welder and the drawing they needed.

Drawing retrieval dropped from 5–10 minutes to about 30 seconds. Welders responded positively, and stakeholders asked about applying the same approach to other paper-based processes.

  • 5–10 min became about 30 sec

    Drawing retrieval time, from searching network folders to one barcode scan.

  • Piloted on the floor

    Tested with welders in real conditions, with interest in expanding to other paper-based processes.

  • 5 roles, 1 person

    Research, design, business analysis, project management, and RPA development, delivered in 3 months.

Learnings

  1. Automation works best when it removes friction without changing how people think about the task. Building around something they already used, the barcode, was a much smaller change than introducing an entirely new process.
  2. Design the exception path alongside the ideal one. Manual entry and help options stayed necessary because the workflow still had to work when scanning failed.

What I'd do next

  1. Expand user testing. Test with welders across the remaining manufacturing plants to find differences in workflows and environments.
  2. Refine for the floor. Use more feedback to improve scanning, manual entry, error handling, and accessibility in the manufacturing environment.
  3. Explore broader automation. Find other paper-based manufacturing workflows where the same approach could cut manual work.

Let's talk

Hiring a Senior UX / Product Designer?

I'm open to remote Senior UX / Product Designer roles, full-time or contract. Bring me the workflow everyone complains about. I'll bring the questions, the prototypes and, on a good day, a truly excellent dad joke.

simplywandee@gmail.com

Read more about me

Redrawn from the real project; data and names changed.